Search

What is Uniform Civil Code?

Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is defined in our Constitution under Article 44 of Directive Principles of State Policy. It states that it is the duty of the state to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India. In other words we can say that it means one country one rule. Let us find out more about Uniform Civil Code, its pros and cons.
Aug 5, 2020 12:02 IST
facebook Iconfacebook Iconfacebook Icon
What is Uniform Civil Code?
What is Uniform Civil Code?

Uniform Civil Code places a set of laws to govern personal matters of all citizens irrespective of religion is perhaps the need of the hour and ensuring that their fundamental and Constitutional rights are protected.

Now a question arises what is Uniform Civil Code? It is the common set of governing rules for all citizens of India which refers to replace the personal laws (based on religious scriptures and customs). These laws are well-known for public law and cover marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption, and maintenance. In fact, Goa has a common family law, thus being the only Indian state to have a uniform civil code and 1954 Special Marriage Act allows any citizen to marry outside the realm of any special religious personal law.

Now let us see our past from where uniform laws are originated.

The British Government in 1840 on the basis of Lex Loci report had framed Uniform laws for crimes, evidence, and contract but personal laws of Hindus and Muslims are left by them somewhere intentionally. On the other hand, British India Judiciary provided for the application of Hindu, Muslim, and English law by British Judges. Also, in those days reformers were raising voice to frame laws related to women against the discrimination done by them basically under religious customs like Sati, etc.

Constituent Assembly was set up to frame our Constitution in 1946 in Independent India which consists of both types of members: those who wanted to reform the society by adopting the Uniform Civil Code like Dr. B. R Ambedkar and other was basically Muslim representatives who perpetuate personal laws. Also, the proponents of the Uniform Civil Code were opposed by the minority communities in the Constituent Assembly. As a result, only one line is added in the Constitution under Article 44 in Part IV of DPSP (Directive Principles of State Policy).

Making of the constituent assembly

It states that “The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India“. As it is incorporated in DPSP they are neither enforceable in the court nor any political discrepancy been able to go beyond it because minorities mainly Muslims felt that their personal laws are violated or abrogated by it. Then a series of Bills were passed to codify Hindu laws in the form of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 and the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, are collectively known as Hindu Code Bill (covers Buddhist, Sikhs, Jains as well as different religious denominations of Hindus) which allows right to divorce and inheritance to women, made caste irrelevant to marriage and abolished bigamy and polygamy.

Also, a mere three words regarding UCC not only affect our nation but are also enough to divide the nation into two categories due to which to take a decision on it becomes a little difficult. These three words are politically, socially, and religiously. Politically, the nation is divided as BJP propagates the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and the non-BJP like Congress, Samajwadi Party who don’t want to implement UCC. Socially, the literate persons of the country who have analysed the pros and cons of UCC & on the other hand illiterate who have no idea about it and being in hands of political pressure they will take decisions. And religiously, there is a gap between the Hindus that are in majority and the Muslim minority communities.

Do you know that in 1985, the Supreme Court first directed the Parliament to frame a UCC?

Jagranjosh

Source:www.cdn.shareyouressays.com

Shah Bano Case

Mohammad Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum mainly known as Shah Bano Case. In this case, in 1985, Shah Bano moved to Supreme Court for seeking maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure when her husband divorced her after 40 years of marriage by giving triple talaq and denied her regular maintenance. The Supreme Court gave the verdict in favour of Shah Bano by applying section 125 of the Indian Criminal Code and it is applied to all citizens irrespective of religion. Then Chief Justice, Y.V Chandrachud, observed that a Common Civil Code would help the cause of national integration by removing disparate loyalties to law. And so, the court directed Parliament to frame a UCC.

On the other hand, Rajiv Gandhi Government was not satisfied from the court decision; instead of supporting it, the government enacted the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 to nullify the Supreme Court judgement in Shah Bano Case and let the Muslim Personal Law prevails in a divorce matter. In this act, it was mentioned that Muslim woman has right for maintenance only for three months after the divorce i.e. iddat and then shifted her maintenance to her relatives or Wakf Board.

Sarla Mudgal Case

This is the second instance in which the Supreme Court again directed the government under Article 44. In this case Sarla Mudgal v Union of India, the question was whether a Hindu husband, married under the Hindu law, by embracing Islam can solemnize the second marriage. The Supreme Court held that adopting Islam for a second marriage is an abuse of Personal laws. Further said that Hindu marriage can be dissolved under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 i.e. mere by converting itself into Islam and marry again does not dissolve the marriage under Hindu Marriage Law and thus will be an offense under Section 494[5] of the Indian Penal Code.

John Vallamattom v. Union of India Case

The Priest from Kerala, John Vallamatton filed a writ petition in the year 1997 stating that Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act was discriminatory against the Christians as it imposes unreasonable restrictions on their donation of property for the religious or charitable purpose by will. The bench comprising of Chief Justice of India V.V Khare, Justice S.B Sinha and Justice A.R. Lakshmanan struck down the Section declaring it to be unconstitutional. Further, Khare stated that;

“Article 44 provides that the State shall endeavour to secure for all citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India. It is a matter of great regrets that Article 44 of the Constitution has not been given effect to. Parliament is still to step in for framing a common civil code in the country. A Common Civil Code will help the cause of national integration by removing the contradictions based on ideologies”.

Supreme Court of India

Let us now see what happened in the JJ Act 2014. Is it a step towards UCC or not?

On passing the verdict of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act seems to be an attempt in moving towards UCC. As it paved the way for the adoption of children by persons from the Muslim communities even though not allowed under their personal laws. The Supreme Court of India again asked the Union Government to form a UCC to remove gender inequality and abolish the retrograde practices followed under the framework of personal laws. 

After seeing all these cases again a question arises what is the importance and need of UCC?

Jagranjosh

As Common Civil Code would put in place a set of laws to govern personal matters of all citizens irrespective of religion is perhaps the need of the hour. In fact, it is the cornerstone of true secularism. Such a progressive reform would not only help end discrimination against women on religious grounds but also strengthen the secular fabric of the country and promote unity. There is a need to reform our social system, which is full of inequities, discriminations, and other things that conflict with our Fundamental Rights. As we know that there is a Criminal Code that is applicable to all people irrespective of religion, caste, tribe and domicile in the country but there is no similar code related to divorce and succession which are governed by Personal laws.

The need for UCC is related to inconsistencies in Tax laws. Like in Hindu Undivided Families they are exempted from taxes whereas Muslims are exempted from paying stamps duty on gift deeds and also it deals with the problem of Honour killings by extra-constitutional bodies like Khap Panchayats.

As we have seen that the success of the contentious bill to ban instant triple talaq is now punishable. Suddenly the possibility of a UCC, though by no means an easy task but it does not appear as unachievable. Also, more aspects of personal laws are likely to be taken up for scrutiny which marks the incremental progress towards UCC. Moreover, the government's decision in relation to Article 370 is also a monumental decision towards national integration.

Now it is necessary to understand about Article 25 with that of UCC

Article 25 states Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice, and propagation of religion. So, the UCC cannot be forcefully imposed on the people as then it will be clearly a violation of Article 25 of the Indian Constitution. Therefore, UCC and Personal laws should be co-existed. UCC is nothing but the incorporation of modern and progressive aspects for all existing personal laws which can’t be ignored.

Do you know about Uniform Civil Code in Goa

After Independence, the State of Goa has adopted the Portuguese Civil Code which enforced a UCC for all its citizens. Under this code, a married couple holds joint ownership in all assets owned and acquired by each spouse. Even Parents can’t disinherit their children entirely at least half of the property must be passed on to them. Muslim persons who have registered their marriage in Goa are not allowed to practice polygamy.

Pros of Uniform Civil Code
- To provide equal status to all citizens irrespective of their religion, class, caste, gender, etc.
- To promote gender equality. UCC will bring both men and women at par.
- To accommodate the aspirations of the young population and to utilise their full potential towards nation-building.
- All Indian citizens are equal before the court of law. That is the criminal laws and other civil laws except personal laws are the same for all. So, UCC is necessary to promote national integration.
- To bypass the issue of reform of existing personal laws.

Cons of Uniform Civil Code

- Due to diversity in India, it is somewhere tough to come up with a common and uniform set of rules but our Government is trying to come up with common rules.
- Several communities, mainly minority communities perceive the Uniform Civil Code as an encroachment on their rights to religious freedom.
- In personal matters, interference of the state. As the constitution provides for the right to freedom of religion of one's choice. But with the codification of uniform rules and its compulsion may reduce the scope of the freedom of religion.
- To bring UCC is a sensitive and tough task but not impossible.

Conclusion:

According to my point of view for an ideal state UCC would be an ideal safeguard of citizen’s rights. Its adoption will be progressive legislation. With changing times, the need has arisen for having a Common Civil Code for all citizens, irrespective of religion, ensuring that their fundamental and Constitutional rights are protected. Even Secularism and National Integrity can also be strengthened by introducing UCC.

In the end, we should recall the words of Mahatma Gandhi: “I do not expect India of my dreams to develop one religion, i.e. to be wholly Christian or wholly Mussalman, but I want it to be wholly tolerant, with its religious working side-by-side with one another”.

Directive Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Rights

Judicial Review and Judicial Activism

Uniform Civil Code is defined in our Constitution under Article 44 which states that it is the duty of the state to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India. Now question arises what is Uniform Civil Code? It is the common set of governing rules for all citizens of India which refers to replace the personal laws (based on religious scriptures and customs). These laws are famous from public law and cover marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption and maintenance. In fact Goa is the only state which has a common family law and 1954 Special Marriage Act allows any citizen to marry outside the realm of any special religious personal law.

Source: www.politicalmirror.com

Now let us see our past from where uniform laws are originated.

The British Government in 1840 on the basis of Lex Loci report had framed Uniform laws for crimes, evidences and contract but personal laws of Hindus and Muslims are left by them somewhere intentionally. On the other hand British India Judiciary provided for application of Hindu, Muslim and English law by British Judges. Also, in those days reformers were raising voice to frame laws related to women against the discrimination done by them basically under religious customs like Sati etc.

Constituent Assembly was set up to frame our Constitution in 1946s in Independent India which consists of both types of members: those who wanted to reform the society by adopting Uniform Civil Code like Dr. B. R Ambedkar and other was basically Muslim representatives who perpetuate personal laws. Also, the proponents of Uniform Civil Code were opposed by the minority communities in the Constituent Assembly. As a result only one line is added in the Constitution under Article 44 in Part IV of DPSP (Directive Principles of State Policy).

It states thatThe State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India“. As it is incorporated in DPSP they are neither enforceable in the court nor any political discrepancy been able to go beyond it because minorities mainly Muslims felt that their personal laws are violated or abrogated by it. Then a series of Bills were passed to codify Hindu laws in the form of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 and the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, are collectively known as Hindu Code Bill (covers Buddhist, Sikhs, Jains as well as different religious denominations of Hindus) which allows right to divorce and inheritance to women, made caste irrelevant to marriage and abolished bigamy and polygamy.

We have seen that mere three words viz politically, socially and religiously are enough to divide the nation in to two categories. Politically, the nation is divided as BJP propagates the implementation of Uniform Civil Code (UCC) and the non BJP like Congress, Smajwadi Party who don’t want to implement UCC. Socially, the literate persons of the country who have analysed the pros and cons of UCC & on the other hand illiterate who have no idea about it and being in hands of political pressure they will take decision. And religiously, there is a gap between the Hindus that are in majority and Muslims minority community.

Do you know that in 1985, the Supreme Court first directed the Parliament to frame a UCC?

Source:www.cdn.shareyouressays.com

Shah Bano Case

Mohammad Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum mainly known as Shah Bano Case. In this case in 1985, Shah Bano moved to Supreme Court for seeking maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure when her husband divorced her after 40 years of marriage by giving triple talaq and denied her regular maintenance. The Supreme Court gave verdict in favour of Shah Bano by applying section 125 of Indian Criminal Code and it is applied to all citizens irrespective of religion. Then Chief Justice, Y.V Chandrachud, observed that a Common Civil Code would help the cause of national integration by removing disparate loyalties to law. And so, the court directed Parliament to frame a UCC.

On the other hand Rajiv Gandhi Government was not satisfied from the court decision; instead of supporting it the government enacted the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 to nullify the Supreme Court judgement in Shah Bano Case and let the Muslim Personal Law prevails in divorce matter. In this act it was mentioned that Muslim woman has right for maintenance only for three months after the divorce i.e. iddat and then shifted her maintenance to her relatives or Wakf Board.

Sarla Mudgal Case

This is the second instance in which the Supreme Court again directed the government under Article 44. In this case Sarla Mudgal v Union of India, the question was whether a Hindu husband, married under the Hindu law, by embracing Islam can solemnise second marriage. The Supreme Court held that adopting Islam for a second marriage is an abuse of Personal laws. Further said that Hindu marriage can be dissolved under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 i.e. mere by converting itself in to Islam and marry again does not dissolve the marriage under Hindu Marriage Law and thus will be an offence under Section 494[5] of the Indian Penal Code.

John Vallamattom v. Union of India Case

The Priest from Kerala, John Vallamatton filed a writ petition in the year 1997 stating that Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act was discriminatory against the Christians as it imposes unreasonable restrictions on their donation of property for religious or charitable purpose by will. The bench comprising of Chief Justice of India V.V Khare, Justice S.B Sinha and Justice A.R. Lakshamanan struck down the Section declaring it to be unconstitutional. Further Khare stated that;

“Article 44 provides that the State shall endeavour to secure for all citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India. It is a matter of great regrets that Article 44 of the Constitution has not been given effect to. Parliament is still to step in for framing a common civil code in the country. A Common Civil Code will help the cause of national integration by removing the contradictions based on ideologies”.

Let us now see what happened in JJ Act 2014. Is it a step towards UCC or not?

On passing the verdict of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act seems to be an attempt in moving towards UCC. As, it paved the way for an adoption of child by persons from Muslim Community even though not allowed under their personal laws. The Supreme Court of India again asked the Union Government to form a UCC to remove gender inequality and abolish the retrograde practices followed under the framework of personal laws. 

After seeing all these cases again a question arises what is the importance and need of UCC?

As, Common Civil Code would put in place a set of laws to govern personal matters of all citizens irrespective of religion is perhaps the need of the hour. In fact, it is the cornerstone of true secularism. Such a progressive reform would not only help end discrimination against women on religious grounds but also strengthen the secular fabric of the country and promote unity. There is a need to reform our social system, which is full of inequities, discriminations and other things which conflict with our Fundamental Rights. As we know that there is a Criminal Code which is applicable to all people irrespective of religion, caste, tribe and domicile in the country but there is no similar code related to divorce and succession which are governed by Personal laws.

Need of UCC is related to inconsistencies in Tax laws. Like in Hindu Undivided Families they are exempted from taxes where as Muslims are exempted from paying stamps duty on gift deeds and also it deals with the problem of Honour killings by extra constitutional bodies like Khap Panchayats.

Now it is necessary to understand about Article 25 with that of UCC

Article 25 states Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion. So, the UCC cannot be forcefully imposed on the people as then it will be clearly violation of Article 25 if the Indian Constitution. Therefore, UCC and Personal laws should be co-existed. As, UCC is nothing but the incorporation of modern and progressive aspects for all existing personal laws which can’t be ignored.

Do you know about Uniform Civil Code in Goa

After Independence, State of Goa has adopted the Portuguese Civil Code which enforced a UCC for all its citizens. Under this code, Married couple holds joint ownership in all assets owned and acquired by each spouse. Even Parents can’t disinherit their children entirely at least half of the property must be passed on to them. Muslim persons who have registered their marriage in Goa are not allowed to practice polygamy.

Conclusion:

According to my point of view for an ideal state UCC would be an ideal safeguard of citizen’s rights. Its adoption will be a progressive legislation. With changing times, the need has arisen for having a Common Civil Code for all citizens, irrespective of religion, ensuring that their fundamental and Constitutional rights are protected. Even Secularism and National Integrity can also be strengthened by introducing UCC.

At the end we should recall the words of Mahatma Gandhi: “I do not expect India of my dreams to develop one religion, i.e. to be wholly Christian or wholly Mussalman, but I want it to be wholly tolerant, with its religious working side-by-side with one another”.

Directive Principles of State Policy

http://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/directive-principles-of-state-policy-1437132636-1

Making of the constituent assembly

http://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/making-of-the-constituent-assembly-1409308289-1

Fundamental Rights

http://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/fundamental-rights-1434437575-1

Judicial Review and Judicial Activism

http://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/judicial-review-and-judicial-activism-1438065325-1

Supreme Court of India

http://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/supreme-court-of-india-1437204181-1