IPL 2024, Match 65: In a close contest for IPL 2024, Match 65, the Rajasthan Royals, who won the toss and elected to bat first, were restricted to a score of 144 runs in their 20 overs. Despite a steady start, they lost key wickets at crucial moments. The Punjab Kings bowlers, with Sam Curran leading the attack, kept the pressure on. In reply, the Punjab Kings chased down the target with 5 wickets remaining and 2 overs to spare. Here is the list of award winners for the RR vs PBKS match.
Yesterday's IPL 2024 Result RR vs PBKS, Match Number - 65
| Match 65 | |||
| RR | VS | PBKS | |
| 144/9(20) | 145/5(18.5) | ||
| RR: 7.15 | RR: 7.70 | ||
| Riyan Parag: 48 of 34 Ravichandran Ashwin: 28 of 19 | Sam Curran: 63 of 41 Rilee Rossouw: 22 of 13 | ||
| Avesh Khan: 2/28(3.5) Yuzvendra Chahal: 2/31(4) | Sam Curran: 2/24 (3) Rahul Chahar: 2/26(4) | ||
- RR won the toss and chose to bat first
- RR finished with 144 for the loss of 9 wickets in 20 overs.
- PBKS eventually won the match by 5 wickets.
| Yesterday's IPL Match | Match Number | Who Won Yesterday’s IPL Match? |
| RR vs PBKS | 65 | PBKS won by wickets |
Who took most wickets in Yesterday's IPL Match 65 RR vs PBKS?
| Player | Team | Wickets/runs |
| Sam Curran | PBKS | 2/24(3) |
Which batsmen scored the most runs in the RR vs PBKS?
1st Innings:
| Player | Team | Runs |
| Riyan Parag | RR | 48 |
2nd Innings:
| Player | Team | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| Sam Curran | PBKS | 63 |
Who hit the most sixes in Yesterday's IPL match?
| Player | Team | Sixes |
| Sam Curran | PBKS | 3 |
ALSO READ| Most Sixes in IPL
Who Was the Man of the Match of the IPL Yesterday?
| Player | Team | Performance |
| Sam Curran | PBKS | 2/24(3) and 63 of 41 |
RR vs PBKS List of award winners
- Electric Striker of the Match award: Rilee Rossouw- Strike Rate - 169
- Ultimate Fantasy Player of the Match: Sam Curran (148 Fantasy Points)
- Most Sixes of the Match: Sam Curran- 3 Sixes
- Most Fours In The Match: Riyan Parag- 6 Fours
Click on the links below to learn more about IPL 2024:
Comments
All Comments (0)
Join the conversation