Dahsala System

The Dahsala system as instituted by Akbar, the average produce of different crops as well as the average prices prevailing over the last ten years was calculated

Raja Todar Mal, as finance minister of Akbar, brought new system of revenue collection known as zabti system and dahshala system which was a system of taxation. Under the system he took a careful survey of crop yields and prices cultivated for a period of 10 years.  The Dahsala system as instituted by  by Akbar,  the average produce of different crops as well as the average prices prevailing over the last ten years was calculated and  one-third share of the average produce was  apportioned to the state. In fact, historians believe in Mughal period, it was the most significant method of assessment. The origin of this practice is traced in Sher Shah’s reign. During Akbar's reign, the system was revised a number of times before it took the final shape. The system was adopted only in the major provinces of the Empire covering Multan, Delhi, Allahabad, Awadh, Agra, and Lahore.

As earlier mentioned   crop yields and prices cultivated for a period of 10 years was carefully and comprehensively surveyed. On the basis of this comprehensive survey, tax was fixed on each crop in cash. Each province was divided into revenue circles or dastur with their own rates of revenue and a schedule of individual crops or   dasture- amal. This system was put in currency only in those areas and region where the Mughal administration could survey the land and maintain careful account records. Thus Gujarat and Bengal were kept out of purview of this system.

The   system of   Ain-i-Dahsala, was developed by Raja Todarmal. For the   clear measurement of land, bigha -60 x 60 yards- was applied   as standard unit of area. A new gaz or yard, gaz-i-llahi was used as 41 digits (anguls) or 33 inches in length. In order to fix  land revenue, both regularity  and productivity of cultivation were taken into consideration .Thus  Land which had been   continuously  cultivated  was named  polaj and  lands which had been lying  fallow (parauti) for a year, was made to pay full rates (called polaj) to make  it cultivable . Land which had been lying fallow for 3-4 year was categorised as Chachar. This land was levied on a progressive rate and   the full-rate was charged in the third year. There was another category called Banjar or cultivable waste land. In order to make Banjar cultivable, the land   was charged with full rates only after it entered in the 5th year into its cultivation activities.

Furthermore, after land revenue had been assessed in kind, it was converted into cash on the basis of dastur-ul-amal (price schedules). Dastur-ul-amal   was prepared at regional level or dastur (circle) level keeping into consideration food crops. To fecilitate this administrative function smoothly, the empire was segmented into a large number of regions called dastur at pargana (sub district level) clubbed on the basis of same type of productivity. The administration was responsible in the   supply of dastur-ul-amal(schedule of individual crops) at t level of tehsil where, in turn,  the mode of land revenue payment with detailed explanations  was charted out. Subsequently each cultivator received a patta or title deed (land holding deed) and qubuliyat (deed of agreement in accordance with which the cultivator had to pay his dues).

The striking features of the zabti or dahshala system as have been described by the historians were:
• measurement of land was  must under the system
• Fixed cash revenue rates known as dastur for each crop fixed.
• Total   collection of revenue was done only   in cash.

Historians say that from administrative point of view, the system had the following notable merits:
• With fixed and permanent   dasturs system in place, the scope for uncertainties and fluctuation in levying the land revenue demand became ineffective.
• Measurement could always be re-ascertained and rechecked.
• As there   fixed dasturs,so  local officials could not use their discretion  and the chances of misuse of position  by them came to  minimum level .

Historians have also traced some limitations of the zabti or dahshala system which can be described as follows:
• A cess of one dam per bigha known as zabitana was spared  to bear  the costs incurred in maintaining the measurement  of the  party thereby making the method expensive
• There were chances of misusing the authority and   using fraudulent means in recording the measurement of land
• It ws not to be used if the quality of the soil laks in quality of  uniformity;
• If the yield did not come   up to the level of expectations, the peasants were disadvantage because under the prevalent system the responsibility of bearing the risks and loss solely lay with them.
• In words of Abul Fazal, "If the peasant does not have the strength to bear zabti, the practice of taking a third of the crop as revenue is followed."

Find Information on:

Akbar and Rajputs

Akbar: The empire builder

Mansabdari System in Mughal Administration

Karori/Crori System

Akbar‘s other Administrative Reforms

Get the latest General Knowledge and Current Affairs from all over India and world for all competitive exams.
Jagran Play
खेलें हर किस्म के रोमांच से भरपूर गेम्स सिर्फ़ जागरण प्ले पर
Jagran PlayJagran PlayJagran PlayJagran Play

Related Categories