IPL 2024, Match 69: In a thrilling encounter for playoff positioning, Sunrisers Hyderabad secured a crucial 4-wicket victory over Punjab Kings in match 69 of IPL 2024. Abhishek Sharma shone for SRH with a brilliant knock, propelling them to a competitive total of 215 runs. Despite a strong start by the Punjab Kings openers, Hyderabad's bowlers held their nerve, restricting Punjab to 214 runs. Here is the list of all the award winners for the match.
Yesterday's IPL 2024 Result PBKS vs SRH, Match Number - 69
| Match 69 | |||
| PBKS | VS | SRH | |
| 214/5(20) | 215/6(19.1) | ||
| RR: 10.70 | RR: 11.2 | ||
| Prabhsimran Singh: 71 of 45 Rilee Russouw: 49 of 24 | Abhishek Sharma: 66 of 28 Henrich Klaasen: 42 of 26 | ||
| Arshdeep Singh: 2/37(4) Harshal Patel: 2/49(4) | T. Natarajan: 2/33(4) Pat Cummins: 1/36(4) | ||
- PBKS won the toss and chose to bat first
- PBKS finished with 215 for the loss of 5 wickets in 20 overs.
- SRH eventually won the match by 4 wickets.
| Yesterday's IPL Match | Match Number | Who Won Yesterday’s IPL Match? |
| PBKS vs SRH | 69 | SRH won by wickets |
Who took most wickets in Yesterday's IPL Match 69 PBKS vs SRH?
| Player | Team | Wickets/runs |
| T. Natarajan | SRH | 2/33(4) |
Which batsmen scored the most runs in the PBKS vs SRH?
1st Innings:
| Player | Team | Runs |
| Prabhsimran Singh | PBKS | 71 |
2nd Innings:
| Player | Team | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| Abhishek Sharma | SRH | 66 |
Who hit the most sixes in Yesterday's IPL match?
| Player | Team | Sixes |
| Abhishek Sharma | SRH | 6 |
ALSO READ| Most Sixes in IPL
Who Was the Man of the Match of the IPL Yesterday?
| Player | Team | Performance |
| Abhishek Sharma | SRH | 66 of 28 |
PBKS vs SRH List of award winners
- Electric Striker of the Match award: Abhishek Sharma- Strike Rate - 235
- Ultimate Fantasy Player of the Match: Prabhsimran Singh (102 Fantasy Points)
- Most Sixes of the Match: Abhishek Sharma- 6 Sixes
- Most Fours In The Match: Prabhsimran Singh- 7 Fours
Click on the links below to learn more about IPL 2024:
Comments
All Comments (0)
Join the conversation