The ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) Exam was held today, February 18, 2025. The exam lasted for 3 hours, with an extra 15 minutes for reading the question paper. Total marks allocated for the subject is 80 marks and 20 is for internal assessments. Now that the exam is over, we provide a detailed analysis, including students' reactions, expert opinions, and the difficulty level of the paper. We’ve also shared the ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) Question Paper 2025 PDF and the Answer Key to help students check their answers and evaluate their performance.
Check| ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) Question Paper 2025 PDF
Check| ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) Answer Key 2025 PDF
ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) Exam 2025: Highlights
| Exam Name | ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) Exam 2025 |
| Exam Date | February 18, 2025 |
| Exam Duration | 3 Hours + 15 Minutes Reading Time |
| Difficulty Level | To be checked |
| Official Website | https://cICSEe.org/ |
ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) Paper Analysis 2025
Students' Feedback:
The ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) exam 2025 was a mix of easy and moderate sections. While many students found the reading comprehension and grammar parts straightforward, some considered the literature section to be moderate to challenging. The essay and letter writing topics were seen as unexpected by a few students, though not particularly difficult. Overall, students felt the paper was of average difficulty. However, the experience varied—some found it easier, while others thought it was more challenging. Notably, no question was out of the syllabus, and most students found the paper attemptable with all questions being approachable. However, the analysis will vary student to student, depending on the level of understanding.
Teachers' Perspective:
Teachers found the ICSE Class 10 English Language (Paper 1) exam 2025 to be fair, well-structured, and balanced. They appreciated how the paper effectively covered all the essential topics from the syllabus. The reading and writing sections were considered easy and accessible, while the literature questions required a deeper understanding and analytical approach. One teacher remarked, “The exam evaluated students' ability to think critically and apply their knowledge.” Overall, teachers felt that students who had prepared thoroughly would do well, and they appreciated the fact that there were no unexpected or out-of-syllabus questions. The paper was designed in a way that all students could attempt it and answer the questions with a reasonable level of ease.
Also Check |
Comments
All Comments (0)
Join the conversation