CBSE on 26 July 2017 was pulled up by the Delhi High Court for causing hardship to students by not notifying on its site that re-evaluation was permissible in all subjects of class 12th.
This move came after the Delhi High Court was told that CBSE was reluctant to accept applications for re-evaluation after the court on July 6 had directed the board to re-evaluate the answer sheets of all the subjects of all students who wrote the CBSE Class 12th board exam 2017 and were seeking re- evaluation.
CBSE, in its defense, contended that the deadline for accepting applications was 7 July 2017, as per an earlier order of the high court, & added that re-evaluation cannot be an open-ended exercise.
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar, however, did not accept the CBSE's argument and questioned, "Why did you not post our order online on your website? You gave the students only one-day's time (on July 7) to apply for re-evaluation without even informing them about our decision (of 6th July 2017)."
The High Court also added that once it passed the July 6 order, the deadline no longer applied.
In its July 6 order the high court had said that "the relief (of re-evaluation) is not confined only to the petitioners before it & shall be admissible to all the similarly situated students who seek re-evaluation of their answer sheets".
During the proceedings on 26 July 2017, the Delhi High Court told the lawyers, appearing for some students whose answer sheets were not re- evaluated by the Board, to file an application and said it would pass appropriate orders thereafter.
The observations came during hearing of a plea filed by 4 students against the CBSE's June 28 notice imposing certain conditions with regard to re-evaluation of answer sheets.
The Delhi High Court had set aside the conditions that the right of applying for scrutiny was limited to 12 subjects only, with maximum 10 questions per subject and a revised mark sheet would be issued only if the marks increased by five or were reduced by one.
The marks of all four petitioner students saw substantial increase, their lawyers told the bench today which said to CBSE, "Have you looked at the disparity? 64 marks have become 93 (in one case). That is too much."
When the Board said that in most cases the increase was of only one of two marks, the court remarked that "even one mark makes a lot of difference". The matter has now been fixed for further hearing on 29 August 2017.
(With Inputs from PTI)
DISCLAIMER: JPL and its affiliates shall have no liability for any views, thoughts and comments expressed on this article.
CBSE Class 10 Compartment Result 2018: Options for Students Who Failed the Exam
What for those who failed in the CBSE 12th Compartment Exams 2018?
JEE, NEET 2019: Unique question paper for each candidate; what would be the effects and benefits?
CBSE refutes news of 50% students getting more marks after re-evaluation; know the true facts