IPL 2024, Match 38: Rajasthan Royals asserted their authority at the top of the table with a commanding nine-wicket victory over the Mumbai Indians at the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur on Monday (April 22). The match witnessed a formidable performance from Rajasthan Royals, as Mumbai Indians faced a top-order collapse. Yuzvendra Chahal further embellished the occasion by reaching a significant milestone of 200 wickets in the IPL, amidst a stellar display that included a century by Yashasvi Jaiswal as well.
RR won the match against MI by 9 wickets.
Yesterday's IPL 2024 Result MI vs RR, Match Number - 38
| Match 38 | |||
| MI | VS | RR | |
| 179/9(20) | 181/1(18.4) | ||
| RR:8.95 | RR: 9.83 | ||
| Tilak Varma: 65(45) Nehal Wadhera: 49(24) Mohammad Nabi: 23(17) | Yashasvi Jaiswal: 104(60) | ||
| Sandeep Sharma: 5/18(4) Trent Boult: 2/32(4) | Piyush Chawla: 1/33(4) | ||
- MI won the toss and chose to bat first
- MI finished with 179 for the loss of 9 wickets in 20 overs.
- RR won the match by 9 wickets.
| Yesterday's IPL Match | Match Number | Who Won Yesterday’s IPL Match? |
| RR vs MI | 38 | RR won by 9 wickets |
Who took the most wickets in Yesterday's IPL Match 38, MI vs RR?
| Player | Team | Wickets/runs |
| Sandeep Sharma | RR | 5 |
Which batsmen scored the most runs in the MI vs RR?
1st Innings:
| Player | Team | Runs |
| Tilak Varma | MI | 65(45) |
2nd Innings:
| Player | Team | Runs |
| Yashasvi Jaiswal | RR | 104(60) |
Who hit the most sixes in Yesterday's IPL match?
| Player | Team | Sixes |
| Yashasvi Jaiswal | RR | 7 |
ALSO READ| Most Sixes in IPL
Who Was the Man of the Match of the IPL Yesterday?
| Player | Team | Performance |
| Sandeep Sharma | RR | 5/18 |
MI vs RR List of award winners
- Electric Striker of the Match award: Nehal Wadhera -Strike Rate: 204.17
- Ultimate Fantasy Player of the Match: Sandeep Sharma (159 Fantasy Points)
- Most Sixes of the Match: Yashasvi Jaiswal - 7 Sixes
- Most Fours In The Match: Yashasvi Jaiswal - 9 Fours
Click on the links below to learn more about IPL 2024:
Comments
All Comments (0)
Join the conversation